Chat
Chat IA
Previsão da IA
Odds
Dados
Waterford FC vs Shelbourne FC
Match Prediction Report
Full Game
| Key Indicator | Predicted Value |
|---|---|
| 1x2 Result Probability | Away · Home 30% / Draw 29% / Away 41% |
| Correct Score | 1 - 2 |
| Double Chance probability | 1X 59% / X2 70% / 12 71% |
| Both Teams To Score probability | Yes 54% / No 46% |
| Asian Handicap | Away -0.25 · Away covers |
| Over / Under | 2.5 |
| Clean Sheet | Home: No · Away: No |
| Total Corners | 9 |
| Corner Division | Home 4 – Away 5 |
| Total Cards (Yellow / Red) | 5Y / 0R |
| Card Division | Home 2Y/0R – Away 3Y/0R |
1st Half
| Key Indicator | Predicted Value |
|---|---|
| 1x2 Result Probability | Draw · Home 28% / Draw 45% / Away 27% |
| Half-Time Score | 0 - 0 |
| Both Teams To Score probability | Yes 22% / No 78% |
| Asian Handicap | Away +0.25 · Away covers |
| Over / Under | 1.0 |
| Total Corners | 4 |
| Total Cards (Yellow / Red) | 2Y / 0R |
2nd Half
| Key Indicator | Predicted Value |
|---|---|
| 1x2 Result Probability | Away · Home 27% / Draw 34% / Away 39% |
| 2nd Half Score | 1 - 2 (2nd half only, not cumulative) |
| Both Teams To Score probability | Yes 58% / No 42% |
| Asian Handicap | Away -0.25 · Away covers |
| Over / Under | 1.5 |
| Total Corners | 5 |
| Total Cards (Yellow / Red) | 3Y / 0R |
Latest Data
- Odds snapshot (Unibet, latest update): HT/FT grid shows Away/Away shortest at 2.75, Draw/Draw 4.9, Home/Home 5.5; market leans toward the Away side with moderate draw protection.
- Recent form: Home LWDLW; Away WLWWL.
- Head-to-head (recent): Waterford FC 2 wins (both away), 2 draws at Waterford, Shelbourne FC 1 win (home); most meetings competitive, average around mid-2 goals per game.
- Likely tactical shapes: Home in a 4-2-3-1 seeking quick transitions and early crosses; Away in a compact 4-3-3 morphing to 4-2-3-1, prioritizing controlled buildup and strong counter-press.
- Player tendencies: Home wide players drive inside to combine with a central striker; double pivot screens and looks for diagonals. Away full-backs provide width while the front three attack space between lines; set-piece delivery a consistent weapon.
- Referee profile: Moderate foul count, typically 4–6 yellows, low red-card risk; allows advantage, which can increase transition phases.
- Standings context: Away pushing the upper places; Home around mid-table aiming to consolidate the top half. Three points swing matters for European push vs. consolidation.
90 Minutes Prediction Result
1 - 2
AI Match Analysis
Waterford FC arrive with an up-and-down run (LWDLW), while Shelbourne FC carry slightly stronger momentum (WLWWL). The recent head-to-head at the RSC has leaned draw-heavy, but overall meetings have been edged by Waterford FC when away; back on Waterford soil, the balance tightens and points to a narrow margin either way.
On the pitch, Waterford FC’s 4-2-3-1 should target fast breaks down the channels and early deliveries to unsettle the center-backs. Shelbourne FC’s compact 4-3-3 tends to control territory with a sturdy counter-press, then spring runners off the nine. That dynamic suggests a cautious first half before space opens after the interval. With both sides capable from set plays and transitions, chances should arrive on both ends, though Shelbourne FC’s second-half efficiency tips the scale.
Contextually, Shelbourne FC’s push near the top raises urgency, while Waterford FC’s mid-table footing still demands points. A moderate-referee profile aligns with a physical but controlled contest. Model read: a tight game tilted by Shelbourne FC’s cleaner attacking patterns after halftime.
AI Prediction Summary
Waterford FC’s LWDLW run shows flashes without sustained control, while Shelbourne FC’s WLWWL points to a stronger baseline. Expect a measured opening, with Waterford FC probing via quick transitions and Shelbourne FC compressing space before raising the tempo after the break. The decisive moments should come from Shelbourne FC’s sharper counter-press and set-piece quality. Final call: Shelbourne FC to edge it 2-1, with both teams creating enough to score. Shelbourne FC are more likely to win, but Waterford FC’s wide attacks can keep it tight into the last half hour. Corners and cautions look moderate in a competitive, physical game.